HAVE YOUR SAY.

Join us in The Bullpen, where the members of the Scientific Inquirer community get to shape the siteโ€™s editorial decision making. Weโ€™ll be discussing people and companies to profile on the site. On Wednesday, August 31 at 5:30pm EST, join us on Discord and letโ€™s build the best Scientific Inquirer possible.


People with an obsessive urge to constantly check the news are more likely to suffer from stress, anxiety, as well as physical ill health, finds a new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Health Communication.

During the last two years we have lived through a series of worrying global events, from the COVID pandemic to Russia invading Ukraine, large-scale protests, mass shootings and devastating wildfires. For many people, reading bad news can make us feel temporarily powerless and distressed.

For others, being exposed to a 24-hour news cycle of continually evolving events can have serious impacts on mental and physical wellbeing โ€“ as these new findings, out today, show, with those who have a high-levels of news addiction reporting โ€œsignificantly greater physical ill-beingโ€.


ON SALE! Charles Darwin Signature T-shirt – “I think.” Two words that changed science and the world, scribbled tantalizingly in Darwin’s Transmutation Notebooks.

โ€œWitnessing these events unfold in the news can bring about a constant state of high alert in some people, kicking their surveillance motives into overdrive and making the world seem like a dark and dangerous place,โ€ says Bryan McLaughlin, associate professor of advertising at the College of Media and Communication at Texas Tech University.

โ€œFor these individuals, a vicious cycle can develop in which, rather than tuning out, they become drawn further in, obsessing over the news and checking for updates around the clock to alleviate their emotional distress. But it doesnโ€™t help, and the more they check the news, the more it begins to interfere with other aspects of their lives.โ€

To study this phenomenon, known colloquially as news addiction, McLaughlin and his colleagues, Dr Melissa Gotlieb and Dr Devin Mills, analysed data from an online survey of 1,100 US adults.

In the survey, people were asked about the extent to which they agreed with statements like โ€œI become so absorbed in the news that I forget the world around meโ€, โ€œmy mind is frequently occupied with thoughts about the newsโ€, โ€œI find it difficult to stop reading or watching the newsโ€, and โ€œI often do not pay attention at school or work because I am reading or watching the newsโ€.

Respondents were also asked about how often they experienced feelings of stress and anxiety, as well as physical ailments such as fatigue, physical pain, poor concentration, and gastrointestinal issues.

The results revealed that 16.5% of people surveyed showed signs of โ€˜severely problematicโ€™ news consumption. Such individuals frequently became so immersed and personally invested in news stories that the stories dominated the individualโ€™s waking thoughts, disrupted time with family and friends, made it difficult to focus on school or work, and contributed to restlessness and an inability to sleep.

Perhaps not surprisingly, people with higher levels of problematic news consumption were significantly more likely to experience mental and physical ill-being than those with lower levels, even when controlling for demographics, personality traits, and overall news use.

When asked how frequently survey participants experienced mental health or physical illness symptoms over the past month, results show:

  • 73.6% of those recognized to have severe levels of problematic news consumption reported experiencing mental ill-being โ€œquite a bitโ€ or โ€œvery muchโ€ โ€“ whilst frequent symptoms were only reported by 8% of all other study participants.
  • 61% of those with severe levels of problematic news reported experiencing physical ill-being โ€œquite a bitโ€ or โ€œvery muchโ€ compared to only 6.1% for all other study participants.

According to McLaughlin, the findings show that there is a need for focused media literacy campaigns to help people develop a healthier relationship with the news.

โ€œWhile we want people to remain engaged in the news, it is important that they have a healthier relationship with the news,โ€ he says.

โ€œIn most cases, treatment for addictions and compulsive behaviors centers on complete cessation of the problematic behavior, as it can be difficult to perform the behavior in moderation.

โ€œIn the case of problematic news consumption, research has shown that individuals may decide to stop, or at least dramatically reduce, their news consumption if they perceive it is having adverse effects on their mental health.

โ€œFor example, previous research has shown that individuals who became aware of and concerned about the adverse effects that their constant attention to sensationalized coverage of COVID-19 was having on their mental health reported making the conscious decision to tune out.

โ€œHowever, not only does tuning out come at the expense of an individualโ€™s access to important information for their health and safety, it also undermines the existence of an informed citizenry, which has implications for maintaining a healthy democracy. This is why a healthy relationship with news consumption is an ideal situation.โ€

In addition, the study also calls out the need for a wider discussion about how the news industry may be fuelling the problem.

โ€œThe economic pressures facing outlets, coupled with technological advances and the 24- hour news cycle have encouraged journalists to focus on selecting โ€œnewsworthyโ€ stories that will grab news consumersโ€™ attention,โ€ says McLaughlin.

โ€œHowever, for certain types of people, the conflict and drama that characterize newsworthy stories not only grab their attention and draw them in, but also can lead to a maladaptive relationship with the news. Thus, the results of our study emphasise that the commercial pressures that news media face are not just harmful to the goal of maintaining a healthy democracy, they also may be harmful to individualsโ€™ health.โ€

Limitations of this study include reliance on a data collected at one point in time, where the authors could not establish the exact relationship between problematic news consumption and mental and physical ill-being.

IMAGE CREDIT: NASA.


Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

“We Are Nature”: Doug Anderson and Toby Strong on making “Ocean with David Attenborough”
In celebration of Sir David Attenborough's 100th birthday, filmmakers Doug Anderson and …
Can You Fall in Love with Something That Was Never Alive? Her, Ex Machina, and the Question Nobody Wants to Answer
The films "Her" and "Ex Machina" explore human-AI relationships, highlighting emotional dependencies …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading