cSign up for Scientific Inquirer’s Steady State Newsletter for the week’s top stories, exclusive interviews, and weekly giveaways. Plenty of value added but without the tax. http://bit.ly/2VEF06u
Algorithms and deep learning has enabled Flinders University sleep researchers to dive deep into one of the mysteries of sleep health.
They have used machine learning and artificial intelligence to develop a free online tool being used by sleep experts and researchers around the world to work out the role of the so-called K-complex, a prominent, brief up-down-up pattern of brain electro-encephalogram (EEG) electrical activity lasting around half a second during sleep.
When displayed on an EEG screen, it looks a bit like a ‘K’, says Bastien Lechat, lead author on a new Flinders University paper published in Sleep journal (pre-press).
“We hope this algorithm will help to fast forward new discoveries regarding the mysterious K-complex waveform and its associated health outcomes.”
“A lack of K-complexes has been linked to various clinical problems, such as Alzheimer’s disease and insomnia, suggesting that K-complexes are an important part of normal sleep and health.”
“While the meaning and role of K-complexes is rather unclear, one of the leading theories is that they reflect low-level decision processing to either wake up or stay asleep in response to sensory input during sleep,” says Mr Lechat, from the Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health at Flinders University.
K-complexes occur roughly every two minutes during sleep, so are too labour-intensive for routine sleep scoring.
If K-complexes were considered, it would take an expert sleep technician approximately 0.5 to 1.5 hours longer to score one sleep study.
Manual scoring also comes with a lot of variability, with agreement between expert scorers as low as 50%. The deep learning algorithm to automatically score K-complexes during overnight sleep studies is much faster and more reliable than with manual scoring.
The algorithm takes around 3 minutes to score an entire night of sleep and out-performs all currently available automated methods,” says co-author Dr Branko Zajamsek.
“In addition to its enhanced detection speed and accuracy, the algorithm also gives a ‘confidence’ or probability rating, allowing for more useful comparisons between clear versus ambiguous K-complex signals – as defined by human scoring.
“This makes the sleep scoring output comprehensive, yet very easy to understand compared to other automated methods.”
IMAGE SOURCE: Creative Commons
Words matter. Images matter. The Scientific Inquirer needs your support. Help us pay our contributors for their hard work. Visit our Patreon page and discover ways that you can make a difference. http://bit.ly/2jjiagi