A new study finds that temporary nature-based carbon removal can lower global peak warming levels but only if complemented by ambitious fossil fuel emission reductions.

Exclusive Darwin Tree of Life (just think.) Sci-Tee only at Scientific Inquirer!

Nature-based climate solutions aim to preserve and enhance carbon storage in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems and could be a potential contributor to Canadaโ€™s climate change mitigation strategy.

โ€œHowever, the risk is that carbon stored in ecosystems could be lost back to the atmosphere as a result of wildfires, insect outbreaks, deforestation or other human activities,โ€ says Kirsten Zickfeld, a distinguished professor of climate science in Simon Fraser University’s Department of Geography who is on the research team.

The researchers used a global climate model to simulate temperature change through two scenarios ranging from weak to ambitious greenhouse gas emissions reductions. In the relatively weak emissions reduction scenario, carbon emissions continue through 2100. In the ambitious scenario carbon emissions reach net-zero by 2050.


Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

In order to meet the Paris Agreementโ€™s climate goals, the world will need to reach net-zero CO2 emissions around or before mid-century, according to the United Nationsโ€™ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

In both scenarios, it is assumed that carbon storage through nature-based climate solutions is temporary as forests are vulnerable to both natural and human disturbances. Therefore, nature-based climate solutions are anticipated to withdraw carbon from the atmosphere over the next 30 years then slowly release the carbon during the second half of the century.

The team found that in a scenario with carbon emissions decreasing rapidly to net-zero, temporary nature-based carbon storage can decrease the level of peak warming. However, in a scenario with continued carbon emissions temporary nature-based carbon storage would serve only to delay the temperature increase.

โ€œOur study shows that nature-based carbon storage, even if temporary, can have tangible climate benefits, but only if implemented alongside a rapid transition to zero fossil-fuel emissions,โ€ says Zickfeld.


Above 2,000 meters: Cova 338 redefines Pyrenean prehistory
An international team led by UAB has uncovered significant prehistoric human occupation …
DAILY DOSE: Vitamin K Refusals By Anti-Vaxxers Put Newborns at Deadly Risk; Possible Lost Maya Refuge City Found in Chiapas Jungle.
Increasing vitamin K refusals by U.S. parents are endangering newborns' health, leading …
Non-rotating early galaxy is a surprise to astronomers
Astronomers have discovered a non-rotating galaxy, XMM-VID1-2075, using the James Webb Space …
How plants make copies of themselves โ€“ key gene identified in model plant
A Hiroshima University team identified the GEMMIFER gene as crucial for asexual …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading