Over the past decade, the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer, helping many live longer lives and improving overall survival for the disease. However, an important question has remained unanswered: How long should a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who receives immunotherapy as part of their initial treatment, continue with treatment?

A new retrospective cohort study, published today in JAMA Oncology and presented at the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (Abstract 9101) by researchers from Penn Medicine’s Abramson Cancer Center, suggests that it’s reasonable to stop immunotherapy treatment at two years as long as their cancer hasn’t progressed. The researchers found no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who stopped treatment at two years and those who continued treatment indefinitely.

“We hope this data provides reassurance that stopping treatment at two years is a valid treatment strategy that does not seem to compromise overall survival,” said lead author Lova Sun, MD, an assistant professor of Hematology-Oncology at the Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania. “In the absence of definitive prospective data about the duration of therapy – which will take years to accumulate – our goal was to use real-world observational data to provide guidance on this important clinical question.”

If you enjoy the content we create and would like to support us, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon! By joining our community, you’ll gain access to exclusive perks such as early access to our latest content, behind-the-scenes updates, and the ability to submit questions and suggest topics for us to cover. Your support will enable us to continue creating high-quality content and reach a wider audience.

Join us on Patreon today and let’s work together to create more amazing content! https://www.patreon.com/ScientificInquirer

The appropriate length of treatment remains an open question because pivotal clinical trials have used different treatment durations, and as therapies have been approved and become widely available, many patients have continued therapy beyond the one to two years tested in clinical trials. The longer a patient continues treatment, the higher the health care costs become – both to the patient and to the health care system – and there is ongoing risk of immune-related side effects.

In this study, the researchers analyzed de-identified data from a national electronic health record that included patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in both academic and community settings. Of the 1,091 patients who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor as part of their initial therapy (either alone or in combination with chemotherapy) and whose cancer had not continued to grow, only one in five stopped immunotherapy at two years and were considered the “fixed duration” group for this analysis. The vast majority who continued treatment beyond two years were considered the “indefinite duration” group.

The team analyzed the data and found similar overall survival probabilities between the two groups: 79% for fixed duration and 81% for indefinite duration.

“Ultimately, the field is still on the leading edge of determining the most appropriate duration for these immunotherapies that have been so effective for patients with advanced lung cancer,” said senior author Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, the Leslye M. Heisler Associate Professor for Lung Cancer Excellence in Hematology-Oncology at Penn. “This study provides important data that we hope will help patients feel less worried about potential risks of coming off therapy and more confident if they decide to discontinue treatment after two years.” 

IMAGE CREDIT: NASA.