HAVE YOUR SAY.
Join us in The Bullpen, where the members of the Scientific Inquirer community get to shape the site’s editorial decision making. We’ll be discussing people and companies to profile on the site. On Wednesday, November 9 at 5:30pm EST, join us on Discord and let’s build the best Scientific Inquirer possible.
There are now high levels of sweet and fruit-flavoured chemicals likely to appeal to young people in e-cigarette liquids ostensibly marketed as ‘tobacco-flavoured’, compared with a decade ago, finds research published today in a special supplement* of the journal Tobacco Control.
This recent trend coincides with the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) ban on the sale of cartridge based flavoured e-cigarettes–with the exception of menthol and tobacco flavours–in a bid to limit their appeal to young people. And it suggests that manufacturers are managing to get round the regulations, say the researchers.
E-liquid formulations have been evolving rapidly over the past decade, and flavour chemicals are particularly important because young people like fruit, candy, and sweet flavours, say the researchers.
And disposable products, such as Puff, which are particularly popular with young people, aren’t covered by the FDA’s ban.
The researchers therefore wanted to find out if e-cigarettes marketed as ‘tobacco flavoured’ contained sweet and fruit flavour chemicals that would likely appeal to young people.
They drew on their extensive database (UCR/PSU Electronic Cigarette Data Collection) of e-liquid and aerosol flavour chemicals, acids, reaction products and metals, to identify any trends and changes in chemical composition and levels since 2010-11.
They compared the number and amount of flavour chemicals in 63 ‘tobacco-flavoured’ e-cigarette refill fluids purchased between 2011 and 2019 and 2 popular pod-style e-cigarette brands—JUUL and Puff.
Tobacco-flavoured products purchased in 2010 and 2011 had very few flavour chemicals, overall, the levels of which were generally very low.
Nearly two thirds (63%) of the refill fluids bought before 2019 had levels of flavour chemicals below 2 mg/ml, and most (84%) were below 5 mg/ml.
But the total number and level of flavour chemicals in ‘tobacco flavoured’ refill fluids purchased in 2019 and in Puff Bar Tobacco e-cigarettes, were higher than expected.
Among the 13 refill products bought in 2019, more than half (54%) had total flavour chemical levels above 10 mg/ml. Products with total flavour chemicals of more than 10 mg/ml contained 1 to 5 dominant flavour chemicals (each more than 1 mg/ml).
The 5 most frequently used flavour chemicals in ‘tobacco flavoured’ e-liquids were predominantly fruity and caramellic: ethyl maltol (sweet or caramel, 60%); corylone (caramellic, maple, 44%); menthol (33%); vanillin (25%), maltol and triacetin (fruity, creamy, 24%).
Nine sweet and fruit flavour chemicals, used mainly in products bought in 2016 and 2019, were at levels above 2 mg/ml.
JUUL has marketed two tobacco flavours, ‘Classic’ and ‘Virginia’. Total flavour chemical levels for both these products were below 0.35 mg/ml, while levels of the individual chemicals were, in most cases, equal to, or less than, 0.05 mg/ml.
Different flavour chemicals were used in the ‘Classic’ and ‘Virginia’ products, suggesting these were added intentionally to create distinct tastes for each product.
Puff ‘Tobacco’, on the other hand, had 27 different flavour chemicals adding up to a total of 34.3 mg/ml. Individual chemicals ranged from 0.03 to 15 mg/ml.
Four flavour chemicals (vanillin, ethyl maltol, ethyl vanillin and corylone), which were the highest (range 2.07–15 mg/ml), are typically used in sweet-flavoured e-cigarette products, such as Dewberry Cream, which is popular with young vapers, note the researchers.
For the dominant flavour chemicals found in both brands, levels of vanillin were 300 times higher in Puff than in JUUL, while ethyl maltol was 239 times higher, and corylone 41 times higher.
The total number of flavour chemicals used in Puff Bar Tobacco was greater than those found in nearly all (94%) the refill fluids evaluated.
“Concern has been raised previously about the safety of flavour chemicals when inhaled at these high concentrations,” point out the researchers.
“Although these particular flavours are Generally Regarded As Safe by the Flavor Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) for ingestion, FEMA has not evaluated them for inhalation toxicity.”
They conclude: “It is important for the FDA to identify and quantify flavour chemicals before authorising Premarket Tobacco Applications (PMTA) for two reasons.
“First, flavour chemicals are often used in e-liquids without safety data at concentrations much higher than those found in other consumer products. Second, our data show that e-cigarette manufacturers are manipulating e-liquid formulations apparently to circumvent flavour chemical regulations.”
IMAGE CREDIT: NASA.