HAVE YOUR SAY.

Join us in The Bullpen, where the members of the Scientific Inquirer community get to shape the siteโ€™s editorial decision making. Weโ€™ll be discussing people and companies to profile on the site. On Wednesday, November 9 at 5:30pm EST, join us on Discord and letโ€™s build the best Scientific Inquirer possible.


FAREWELL, SECRET GARDEN. HELLO, PUBLIC PARK.

Internet tech companies are sailing into choppy waters thanks to new legislation coming from the European Union. Per Wired,

On November 1, the European Unionโ€™s Digital Markets Act comes into force, starting the clock on a process expected to force Amazon, Google, and Meta to make their platforms more open and interoperable in 2023. That could bring major changes to what people can do with their devices and apps, in a new reminder that Europe has regulated tech companies much more actively than the US.

โ€œWe expect the consequences to be significant,โ€ says Gerard de Graaf, a veteran EU official who helped pass the DMA early this year. Last month, he became director of a new EU office in San Francisco, established in part to explain the lawโ€™s consequences to Big Tech companies. De Graaf says they will be forced to break open their walled gardens.

โ€œIf you have an iPhone, you should be able to download apps not just from the App Store but from other app stores or from the internet,โ€ de Graaf says, in a conference room with emerald green accents at the Irish consulate in San Francisco, where the EUโ€™s office is initially located. The DMA requires dominant platforms to let in smaller competitors, and could also compel Metaโ€™s WhatsApp to receive messages from competing apps like Signal or Telegram, or prevent Amazon, Apple, and Google from preferencing their own apps and services.โ€

It will be really interesting to see how the companies deal with this. Their โ€œwalled gardensโ€ have been in existence for so long that itโ€™s hard to imagine a world without them. https://bit.ly/3FBAm08


ZZZZZZZZZZZ…

The politics of Covid-19โ€™s origins rears its head again. A Senate report with 0 scientists at the helm doubled down on the Republican-favored narrative that the pandemic was the result of a lab accident in Wuhan. Per Science,

The Republican minority staff of a bipartisan Senate committee set up to probe the origin of SARS-CoV-2 issued an โ€œinterim reportโ€ arguing for the narrative that the virus entered humans because of a lab-related incident and not a natural jump from animals to humans. Many virologists and evolutionary biologists who have studied the origins of outbreaks dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis, but other scientists have complained that the possibility was too readily downplayed, and it has become increasingly popular among conservative media outlets and some Republican politicians.

โ€œBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident,โ€ the minority staff concludes in its 35-page report. That conclusion stands in sharp contrast to those of other panels, including from the World Health Organization and U.S. intelligence agencies, which have deemed a zoonotic jump more likely or remained neutral given the lack of direct evidence on the origin of the virus.

Senator Richard Burr (Rโ€“NC), the ranking member of the Senateโ€™s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), wrote in a foreword to the report that the minority oversight staff spent 15 months reviewing scientific studies and interviewing experts. The goal, Burr wrote, was โ€œto provide a clearer picture of what we know, so far, about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 so that we can continue to work together to be better prepared to respond to future public health threats.

Virologists and evolutionary biologists take exception to the reportโ€™s conclusions, claiming that many of the conclusions are the result of cherry picking facts or โ€œhonest misunderstandingsโ€ of the evidence. This debate will never go away. https://bit.ly/3h4tb64


SOMETIMES, THINGS JUST SUCK.

How many times has someone told you that if it doesnโ€™t kill you, it only makes you stronger? Well, there might be meager evidence of this at best. Per the Associated Press,

Thereโ€™s an old saying that adversity makes you stronger. Real life shows thatโ€™s not always true, but the adage highlights an evolving debate among scientists about resilience.

After traumatic events and crises such as child abuse, gun violence or a pandemic, what explains why some people bounce back, while others struggle to cope? Is it nature โ€” genes and other inherent traits? Or nurture โ€” life experiences and social interactions?

Decades of research suggest both play a role, but that neither seals a personโ€™s fate.

Although scientists use different definitions, resilience generally refers to the ability to handle severe stress.

So basically, sometimes, when things suck, they really just suck. https://bit.ly/3sLSjBl


NOT SO FAST…

Finally, with Halloween done and dusted, there are tons of pumpkins laying around waiting to be disposed of. Rather than just dumping them in the trash, thereโ€™s a more planet-friendly option. Again, from the AP,

Hold off before throwing that porch pumpkin into the trash along with Halloween candy wrappers. Those jack-oโ€™-lanterns donโ€™t have to end up in the local landfill.

Consider composting pumpkins in the garden, donating them to community gardens, farms or even a zoo, or simply leaving them as a snack for backyard wildlife.

Gardeners can add pumpkins to the compost pile after removing any remaining seeds and being sure to cut off decorative material such as glitter, paint, stickers and candle wax. Slice the pumpkin into smaller pieces, scatter and bury them into the pile. And donโ€™t worry if the pumpkin has already started getting moldy โ€” those microorganisms aid the composting process.

Pumpkins are a good source of nitrogen. So, yeah, think before you trash it. https://bit.ly/3SZrg02

Thanks for reading. Let’s be careful out there.


ON SALE! Charles Darwin Signature T-shirt – “I think.” Two words that changed science and the world, scribbled tantalizingly in Darwin’s Transmutation Notebooks.

Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

Conversations with Stephen Meyer: On finding God through science and whether the scientific God is the Christian God.
Stephen C. Meyer advocates for intelligent design, arguing that discoveries in science …
The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS was born somewhere much different from our solar system
Less than a year ago, astronomers discovered a comet soaring through our …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading