Hospital staff spend a significant amount of time working to protect patients from acquiring infections while they are being cared for in the hospital. They employ various methods from hand hygiene to isolation rooms to rigorous environmental sanitation. Despite these efforts, hospital-onset infections still occurโ€”the most common of which is caused by the bacterium Clostridioides difficile, or C. diff, the culprit of almost half a million infections in the U.S. each year.

Surprising findings from a new study in Nature Medicine suggest that the burden of C. diff infection may be less a matter of hospital transmission and more a result of characteristics associated with the patients themselves.


ON SALE! Charles Darwin Signature T-shirt – “I think.” Two words that changed science and the world, scribbled tantalizingly in Darwin’s Transmutation Notebooks.

The study team, led by Evan Snitkin, Ph.D. and Vincent Young, M.D., Ph.D., both members of the Departments of Microbiology & Immunology and Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases at University of Michigan Medical School and Mary Hayden, M.D. of Rush University Medical Center, leveraged ongoing epidemiological studies focused on hospital-acquired infections that enabled them to analyze daily fecal samples from every patient within the intensive care unit at Rush University Medical Center over a nine-month period.

Arianna Miles-Jay, a postdoctoral fellow in Dr. Snitkinโ€™s lab, analyzed the over 1,100 patients in the study, and found that a little over 9% were colonized with C. diff. Using whole genome sequencing at U-M of 425 C. difficile strains isolated from nearly 4000 fecal specimens, she compared the strains to each other to analyze spread.


Sign up for the Daily Dose Newsletter and get every morning’s best science news from around the web delivered straight to your inbox? It’s easy like Sunday morning.

Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

โ€œBy systematically culturing every patient, we thought we could understand how transmission was happening. The surprise was that, based on the genomics, there was very little transmission.โ€

Essentially, there was very little evidence that the strains of C. diff from one patient to the next were the same, which would imply in-hospital acquisition. In fact, there were only six genomically supported transmissions over the study period. Instead, people who were already colonized were at greater risk of transitioning to infection.

โ€œSomething happened to these patients that we still donโ€™t understand to trigger the transition from C. diff hanging out in the gut to the organism causing diarrhea and the other complications resulting from infection,โ€ said Snitkin.

Hayden notes this doesnโ€™t mean hospital infection prevention measures are not needed. In fact, the measures in place in the Rush ICU at the time of the study โ€“ high rates of compliance with hand hygiene among healthcare personnel, routine environmental disinfection with an agent active against C diff, and single patient rooms โ€“ were likely responsible for the low transmission rate.  The current study highlights, though that more steps are needed to identify patients who are colonized and try to prevent infection in them.

Where did the C. diff come from? โ€œThey are sort of all around us,โ€ said Young. โ€œC. diff creates spores, which are quite resistant to environmental stresses including exposure to oxygen and dehydrationโ€ฆfor example, they are impervious to alcohol-based hand sanitizer.โ€

However, only about 5% of the population outside of a healthcare setting has C. diff in their gutโ€”where it typically causes no issues.

โ€œWe need to figure out ways to prevent patients from developing an infection when we give them tube feedings, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitorsโ€”all things which predispose people to getting an actual infection with C. diff that causes damage to the intestines or worse,โ€ said Young.

The team next hopes to build on work investigating the use of A.I. models to predict patients at risk of C. diff infection to identify patients who are likely to be colonized and who could benefit from more focused intervention.

Said Snitkin, โ€œA lot of resources are put into gaining further improvements in preventing the spread of infections, when there is increasing support to redirect some of these resources to optimize the use of antibiotics and identify other triggers that lead patients harboring C diff and other healthcare pathogens to develop serious infections.โ€

IMAGE CREDIT: NASA.


If you enjoy the content we create and would like to support us, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon! By joining our community, you’ll gain access to exclusive perks such as early access to our latest content, behind-the-scenes updates, and the ability to submit questions and suggest topics for us to cover. Your support will enable us to continue creating high-quality content and reach a wider audience.

Join us on Patreon today and let’s work together to create more amazing content! https://www.patreon.com/ScientificInquirer


Conversations with Stephen Meyer: On finding God through science and whether the scientific God is the Christian God.
Stephen C. Meyer advocates for intelligent design, arguing that discoveries in science …
The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS was born somewhere much different from our solar system
Less than a year ago, astronomers discovered a comet soaring through our …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading