The illegal wildlife trade (IWT) is a fast-growing โ€˜financial portfolioโ€™ within the larger illegal, violent, parallel transnational global economy. As such, it creates state-level security and development risks, especially in source countries.

IWT is also known as wildlife trafficking, which includes the illicit trade of animals and plants, and derivative products such as pangolin scales, rhino horn, elephant ivory, lion and tiger bones, and leopard pelts.


ON SALE! Charles Darwin Signature T-shirt – “I think.” Two words that changed science and the world, scribbled tantalizingly in Darwin’s Transmutation Notebooks.

But many highly developed countries signed up to CITES, are yet to implement a crucial legal instrument required to prosecute IWT and the associated financial flows more effectively, says Dr Cayle Lupton from the University of Johannesburg (UJ).

The same countries also happen to be signatories of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).


Sign up for the Daily Dose Newsletter and get every morning’s best science news from around the web delivered straight to your inbox? It’s easy like Sunday morning.

Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

In addition, he says IWT law enforcement can be significantly boosted by private companies โ€“ if banks and other financial institutions start fast and efficient sharing of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and IWT intelligence within countries and across borders.

Lupton has published the study โ€˜Illegal wildlife trade: the critical role of the banking sector in combating money launderingโ€™ in the Journal of Money Laundering Control.

Lupton is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Procedural Law, within the Faculty of Law. He is a certi๏ฌed anti-money laundering specialist and an attorney of the High Court of South Africa.

IWT the lesser-known precursor to money laundering

Developed countries are having mixed results in curbing transnational money laundering (ML) in general and IWT in particular, says Lupton. There are reasons for that.

โ€œInternational IWT operations are dif๏ฌcult to detect and disrupt. Investigations are complicated by the cross-border movement of wildlife or derivatives,โ€ says Lupton.

โ€œAlso, IWT operators use complex money laundering techniques involving large amounts of cash, and front and shell companies.

โ€œDealing with IWT as a national issue may not enable the identi๏ฌcation and disruption of international traf๏ฌcking networks. Cooperation at the local, regional and especially international level is imperative in this regard,โ€ adds Lupton.

Countries making AML progress

Some countries are making significant progress in their financial systems though, says Lupton, and a good example is the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

The MAS project starts with the โ€˜big threeโ€™ multinational banks based in Singapore and another three multinational banks. Itโ€™s called โ€œCollaborative Sharing of Money Laundering/Terrorism Financing (ML/TF) Information & Casesโ€ or COSMIC for short.

Also, he says the UK and Australia are examples of countries gaining major ground in sufficiently meeting most of the recommendations from the global Financial Action Task Force to combat money laundering and other illicit financial flows.

Exploiting vulernabilities

But IWT operators exploit vulnerabilities in developed countries. 

As an example, says Lupton, a surprising number of highly developed countries in Western Europe, who are signatories to CITES, still havenโ€™t created laws to make IWT a predicate offense for money laundering.

The majority of developing countries donโ€™t have such laws either. Also where there are โ€˜boots on the groundโ€™ physically combating IWT in areas with endangered species, he adds.

Predicate offence, owners of companies

Wildlife trafficking can be made a predicate offence for money laundering in at least two different ways, says Lupton.

โ€œFirstly, laws may refer explicitly to wildlife trafficking as a predicate offence. This is the case in the USA, where the Eliminate, Neutralize and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act (END Act) allows USA prosecutors to treat wildlife trafficking as a predicate offense for money laundering.

โ€œSecondly, AML laws may be formulated in such a way that an inference can be drawn to wildlife trafficking as a predicate offence. In these instances, provisions are usually formulated widely so that all criminal offences are regarded as predicated offences.

โ€œIn South Africa, for example, โ€˜money launderingโ€™ is defined with reference to โ€˜unlawful activitiesโ€™ which includes illegal wildlife trafficking,โ€ he says.

In addition, FATF recommendation 24 requires countries to ensure that competent authorities have access to adequate, accurate and up-to-date information on the true owners of companies. This is required to combat the use of anonymous shell companies and other businesses to hide money laundering.

Beneficial Ownership Registries are implemented by countries to meet this recommendation.

Taking IWT seriously as trafficking

Despite wildlife trafficking growing into one of the biggest crime industries in the world, it is not prioritised in the same way as drug or people trafficking by governments and financial institutions, says Lupton.

โ€œThere is still relatively little known about the ๏ฌnancial ๏ฌ‚ows and, more speci๏ฌcally, the money laundering practices pertaining to IWT. Many countries still donโ€™t treat IWT as a serious crime, especially countries that are not regarded as source or transit destinationsโ€, he says.

Promulgating IWT as a predicate offence for money laundering, combined with legislative penalties, will increase costs for banks and other financial institutions. Particularly for their compliance programmes for AML (anti-money laundering), customer due diligence (CDD), and KYC (know your customer), if allocated realistic resources. For banks, a robust compliance programme is the cornerstone to adequately dealing with the financial flows linked to wildlife trafficking.

Says Lupton: โ€œAs IWT risks are unique, they require special resources in their mitigation, including focused training, case studies and risk indicators speci๏ฌc to IWT.โ€

First step – IWT as predicate offence

As a first step, many countries need to promulgate laws so that illegal wildlife trade becomes a predicate offence for money laundering, says Lupton.

โ€œBanks, investment companies, real estate companies and other privately owned organisations have to start monitoring their financial systems for signs of money laundering specific to IWT,โ€ he adds, โ€œotherwise they may have to pay statutory penalties for non-compliance. In general, penalties drive compliance.โ€

โ€œThis additional AML monitoring is required, even if endangered animals are slaughtered in another country, or the derivative products will be sold in another country.โ€

Step two – Banks sharing intelligence

The next step is for banks to share information quickly and efficiently about transactions possibly linked to IWT.

Combining the two steps create new options to prosecute IWT, he says.

โ€œIn its 2020 report Money laundering and the illegal wildlife trade, the FATF endorses a private-to-private model of information sharing. They identify indicators to look out for, such as large cash deposits by government officials working in wildlife protection agencies, border control or customs and revenue officials.

โ€œIn my view, banks are particularly well positioned to enable cooperation between themselves in the investigation of transnational IWT ๏ฌnancial ๏ฌ‚ows.

โ€œBanks can leverage their existing domestic, regional and international networks. If they share ๏ฌnancial intelligence quickly and effectively, that can support the investigations of law enforcement agencies.

โ€œSuch shared information can also assist in the freezing and con๏ฌscation of laundered funds or property connected to IWT,โ€ says Lupton.

Overall, curbing IWT not only protects endangered species and the global financial system but can also boost sustainable local development and legal job creation. Future sources of medicines, and cultural practices which regard endangered animals as sacred can also be preserved, he concludes.

IMAGE CREDIT: Therese van Wyk, University of Johannesburg.


If you enjoy the content we create and would like to support us, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon! By joining our community, you’ll gain access to exclusive perks such as early access to our latest content, behind-the-scenes updates, and the ability to submit questions and suggest topics for us to cover. Your support will enable us to continue creating high-quality content and reach a wider audience.

Join us on Patreon today and let’s work together to create more amazing content! https://www.patreon.com/ScientificInquirer


Beetles are likely dispersal vectors for โ€œtoweringโ€ nematodes
In 2025, researchers discovered a new nematode species, Caenorhabditis apta, forming towers …
Hidden math link helps designers build fantastic shapes
Researchers at Princeton developed a method to replicate irregular natural structures, like …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading