HAVE YOUR SAY.

We are proud to announce the inaugural session of The Bullpen, where the members of the Scientific Inquirer community get to shape the siteโ€™s editorial decision making. Weโ€™ll be discussing people and companies to profile on the site. On Wednesday June 8th at 5:30pm EST, join us on Discord and letโ€™s build the best Scientific Inquirer possible.


The iconic Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), identifies species at risk of extinction. A study in PLOS Biology publishing May 26th by Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel, and colleagues present a novel machine learning tool for assessing extinction risk, and then use this tool to show that reptile species which are unlisted due to lack of assessment or data are more likely to be threatened than assessed species.

The IUCNโ€™s Red List of Threatened Species is the most comprehensive assessment of the extinction risk of species and informs conservation policy and practices globally. However, the process for categorizing species is laborious and subject to bias, depending heavily on manual curation by human experts; many animal species have therefore not been evaluated, or lack sufficient data, creating gaps in protective measures.

To assess 4,369 reptile species that were previously unable to be prioritized for conservation and develop accurate methods for assessing the extinction risk of obscure species, these researchers created a machine learning computer model. The model assigned IUCN extinction risk categories to the 40% of the worldโ€™s reptiles that lacked published assessments or are classified as โ€œDDโ€ (โ€œData Deficientโ€) at the time of the study. The researchers validated the modelโ€™s accuracy, comparing it to the Red List risk categorizations.


Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

The researchers found that the number of threatened species is much higher than reflected in the IUCN Red List and that both unassessed (โ€œNot Evaluatedโ€ or โ€œNEโ€) and Data Deficient reptiles were more likely to be threatened than assessed species. Future studies are needed to better understand the specific factors underlying extinction risk in threatened reptile taxa, to obtain better data on obscure reptile taxa, and to create conservation plans that include newly identified, threatened species.

According to the authors, โ€œAltogether, our models predict that the state of reptile conservation is far worse than currently estimated, and that immediate action is necessary to avoid the disappearance of reptile biodiversity. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap on other less known taxaโ€.

Coauthor Shai Meiri adds, โ€œImportantly, the additional reptile species identified as threatened by our models are not distributed randomly across the globe or the reptilian evolutionary tree. Our added information highlights that there are more reptile species in peril โ€“ especially in Australia, Madagascar, and the Amazon basin โ€“ all of which have a high diversity of reptiles and should be targeted for extra conservation effort. Moreover, species rich groups, such as geckos and elapids (cobras, mambas, coral snakes, and others), are probably more threatened than the Global Reptile Assessment currently highlights, these groups should also be the focus of more conservation attentionโ€

Coauthor Uri Roll adds, โ€œOur work could be very important in helping the global efforts to prioritize the conservation of species at risk โ€“ for example using the IUCN red-list mechanism. Our world is facing a biodiversity crisis, and severe man-made changes to ecosystems and species, yet funds allocated for conservation are very limited. Consequently, it is key that we use these limited funds where they could provide the most benefits. Advanced tools- such as those we have employed here, together with accumulating data, could greatly cut the time and cost needed to assess extinction risk, and thus pave the way for more informed conservation decision making.โ€

IMAGE CREDIT: (ENTER NAMES)


Simple blood test could spot dementia years earlier, research shows
Research from the University of East Anglia reveals that blood tests may …
USC scientists build a memory chip that survives temperatures hotter than lava
Researchers at USC developed a memristor that operates reliably at 700 degrees …

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading