Ithaca, New York & Winnipeg, Manitobaโ€”Eighty percent of bird species examined in a new study were reported in greater numbers in human-altered habitats during pandemic lockdowns. Researchers compared online eBird observations from the United States and Canada from before and during the pandemic. They focused on areas within about 100 km of urban areas, major roads, and airports. Their findings were just published in the journal Science Advances.

Fab Four of Science T-shirt (Series). Exclusively on Scientific Inquirerโ€™s Etsy shop. But one now!

โ€œA lot of species we really care about became more abundant in human landscapes during the pandemic,โ€ says study senior author Nicola Koper at the University of Manitoba, which led the research. โ€œI was blown away by how many species were affected by decreased traffic and activity during lockdowns.โ€

Reports of Bald Eagles increased in cities with the strongest lockdowns. Ruby-throated Hummingbirds were three times more likely to be reported within a kilometer of airports than before the pandemic. Barn Swallows, a threatened species in Canada, were reported more often within a kilometer of roads than before the pandemic.


DAILY DOSE: Trump Replaces Casey Means With Fox News Doctor as Surgeon General Pick; Hidden Piece of Pangaea Revealed Beneath Appalachia.
Trump replaces surgeon general nominee amid vaccine concerns and criticism.
Climate change a global threat to brain health, stroke experts say
Climate change increases stroke risks through extreme weather, with efforts needed to …
Snow cover on Greek mountains has more than halved in four decades, study finds
A study reveals that snow cover in Greece's mountains has decreased by …
UN Women report finds online violence and deepfakes drive women from public life
A report reveals increasing online violence against women, worsening mental health and …

A few species decreased their use of human-altered habitat during the pandemic. Red-tailed Hawk reports decreased near roads, perhaps because there was less roadkill when traffic declined. But far more species had increased counts in these human-dominated landscapes.

The authors filtered pandemic and pre-pandemic eBird reports so that the final data sets had the same characteristics, such as location, number of lists, and level of birdwatcher effort.

โ€œWe also needed to be aware of the detectability issue,โ€ explains co-author Alison Johnston from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. โ€œWere species being reported in higher numbers because people could finally hear the birds without all the traffic noise, or was there a real ecological change in the numbers of birds present?โ€

The study tested whether better detectability might be a factor in the larger bird numbers reported. If it was, the scientists expected that to be more noticeable for smaller birds, which are harder to detect beneath traffic noise. However, effects were noticed across many species, from hawks to hummingbirds, suggesting that the increased numbers were not only caused by increased detectability in the quieter environments.

Vast amounts of data from a likewise vast geographic area were vital for this study. The researchers used more than 4 million eBird observations of 82 bird species from across Canada and the U.S.

โ€œHaving so many people in North America and around the world paying attention to nature has been crucial to understanding how wildlife react to our presence,โ€ says lead author Michael Schrimpf, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Manitoba. โ€œStudies such as this one rely on volunteer birdwatchers, so if you enjoy watching wildlife, there are many projects out there, like eBird and iNaturalist, that can use your help.โ€

IMAGE CREDIT: Lynne Marsho, courtesy Cornell Lab of Ornithology


Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading