Recreational hunting — especially hunting of charismatic species for their trophies –raises ethical and moral concerns. Yet recreational hunting is frequently suggested as a way to conserve nature and support local people’s livelihoods.

In a new article published in the journal One Earth, scientists from the University of Helsinki in Finland and Flinders University in Australia have reviewed more than 1,000 studies on recreational hunting — the first such attempt to summarize the scientific literature examining the biodiversity and social effects of recreational hunting globally.

Co-lead author University of Helsinki Associate Professor Enrico Di Minin says while it might seem counterintuitive, there is evidence to suggest some recreational hunting can deliver environmental and social benefits.

University of Helsinki colleague and co-lead author Dr Hayley Clements says more analysis is needed to understand how and why recreational hunting can work for good, and those areas where it can be detrimental.


Dead stars in our cosmic backyard
Astronomers directly detect four hidden white dwarfs in nearby binary systems, including …
Night owls are at greater risk of poor metabolic health
Griffith University research links evening chronotypes and late-night eating to higher body …
Are women better at multitasking than men or is it just a stereotype?
A UK study finds men and women multitask equally well overall, but …
How fair does AI seem in job interviews?
A TUM and Lund University study finds job applicants who share an …

COPY II


Processingโ€ฆ
Success! You're on the list.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Scientific Inquirer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading