HAVE YOUR SAY.
Join us in The Bullpen, where the members of the Scientific Inquirer community get to shape the site’s editorial decision making. We’ll be discussing people and companies to profile on the site. On Wednesday, September 14 at 5:30pm EST, join us on Discord and let’s build the best Scientific Inquirer possible.
University of Auckland scientists model pest control across all of Aotearoa University of Auckland researchers modelled mammal pest control across all of Aotearoa New Zealand to reveal which tools – such as traps, toxins, or fences – will work in each area.
“The good news is that we can achieve much more with existing pest control tools,” said doctoral student Zachary Carter, who led the research. “Our researchshowed large swathes of land in both the North and South Islands will be suitable for traps or toxin distributed by air.”
However, the study also highlighted a challenge: controlling pests in extremely rugged and remote places which aren’t suitable for poisoning, trapping or fencing, or where not enough pest control has been done in the past.
Aotearoa’s ambitious goal is to eliminate rats, possums, ferrets, stoats and weasels by 2050 to save our wildlife and allow endangered birds such as the kākāpō to spread across the nation instead of being confined to small predator-free islands.
In detailed findings from the research:
- Toxin dropped from the air has been applied to about 12 percent of New Zealand’s land (33,000 square kilometres) but about an additional 10 percent (26,000 square kilometres) of land is amenable to this tool
- Roughly 11 percent (or 29,000 square kilometres) of all invaded land may be unsuitable for existing pest control practice
- Exclusion fences will remain a very targeted tool, with only about 0.2 percent of land (500 square kilometres) being suitable on the mainland
“There are some spots that are extremely difficult to get to,” said Carter. “For these highly remote and inaccessible locations, we are going to need some new tools – new technologies, or the novel application of existing tools.”
Professor Dan Tompkins, the science director of Predator Free 2050 Limited, said: “This research shows that current tools and approaches are insufficient even for national predator suppression. That’s a critically important finding.”
“A focus is urgently needed on scientific breakthroughs to ensure the Predator Free 2050 national eradication goal can be reached on time,” Professor Tompkins said.
Researchers relied on machine-learning techniques for the study, which divided the country into small units then looked for similarities to model which existing pest control methods would suit other areas.
“We leveraged the collective knowledge of existing pest control groups,” said Carter.
The research team included University of Auckland academics Professor James Russell, of the School of Biological Sciences and Department of Statistics, and Professor George Perry, of the School of Environmental Sciences, along with Jeffrey Hanson from Carleton University in Canada.
“All of our conservation eggs tend to be in small island baskets, such as Tiritiri Matangi and Kapiti,” said Professor Russell. “The hard work now is getting our biggest islands predator free.”